A bullet leaves evidence that a mortar doesn't.

A weapon does not decide whether or not to kill. A weapon is a manifestation of a decision that has already been made.

It screamed downward, splitting air and sky without effort. A target expanded in size, brought into focus by time and velocity. There was a moment before impact that was the last instant of things as they were. Then the visible world exploded.

When a man carries an instrument of violence, he'll always find the justification to use it. If we really want to escape this war, we have to stop bringing it with us.

The camera can be the most deadly weapon since the assassin's bullet. Or it can be the lotion of the heart.

...and when is enough proof enough?