At first glance, it seems to be a more reasonable approach regarding the restoration of cuts that were made in previous budgets.

A subject which at first glance seems quite removed from the undeclared concern of the book can encapsulate that concern.

The wrong way always seems the more reasonable

At first glance, this seems like a strange deal as investors in Sears Holdings are looking for cash generation, not new investments.

At first glance it might look like a concession by Slobodan Milosevic, but I am afraid that it's a question of a big trap and so there's no need to be euphoric.

At first glance it looks really good. There are some things we'd like to clarify but I can't see any reason why Samba wouldn't move forward with it.