DCYF was able to clarify the intent of the NH statute regarding purging of case records from Bridges to the satisfaction of federal officials from ACF (Administration for Children and Families) this past spring. There is no longer a conflict in this area,

The court denied our petition (to throw the case out because the statute of limitations had expired), so it was a trial or a plea.

We have diligently enforced our statute, and we are asking the court to find that we have done so. Then we will ask the court to order companies to pay in full.

I don't see what contribution, if any, she's going to be able to make in that case.

The proposed OPES charter has since been modified to clarify that the parties that modify content do require explicit authorization. However, there are still indications that some OPES proponents are wanting to standardize an interface [by] which unauthorized modifications can be made.

In this case, what we are concerned with is the intent in the little piece of paper called the ballot. Could each county have different results as to what intent is? ... It presents now a federal question to us, to determine whether or not there is new law.