From our point of view, the issue isn't just a player did this. It's their reaction, and what they did leading up to it and how they handled it afterward.

It probably does signal the idea that a young player on this club doesn't have a birthright to a spot on the club.

I think that from the president's point of view, Sen. Lott has addressed this issue. He has apologized for his statement, and the president understands that is the final word from Sen. Lott.

From my point of view it's quite simple - I only want to cite if a player is injured and can take no further part in the game. I think, apart from that, I wouldn't have an opinion.

From our point of view, the main sticking point was the issue of allowing persons to come in and sue state agencies (and those receiving state funding) for not providing either an interpreter or vital documents translated.

It would in my view be very strange, and that, by the way, was the reaction of a large part of the members.