He ruled that there were some flaws in their (the U.S. Forest Service's) decision. We were very happy with the decision.

The Court of Appeals decision pretty much made it impossible for the government to prevail, ... The court said if the functionality is integrated and creates a plausible advantage to the consumer, then it's a single product and can't be an illegal tie-in. The government didn't anticipate that decision when it filed its complaint.

They have to do the capability analysis for the sage grouse.

They have to do this capability analysis in a site-specific manner.

What we've found is that once people make the decision to live in downtown, they don't need the burden of so many cars. We want people downtown, not cars.

The flaw which is hidden is deemed greater than it is