I believe that our audience can, through our reports - on radio and the Web - get a very detailed sense of what's depicted in the cartoon. By not posting it on the Web, we demonstrate a respect for deeply held religious beliefs.

We receive reports now and then that he may be here or there, ... and if we get a detailed report about his whereabouts, we will certainly go after him too and arrest him.

The bottom line for me is that the cartoon is so highly offensive to millions of Muslims that it's preferable to describe it in words rather than posting it on the web. In this case, I believe that our audience can, through our reports -- on radio and the web -- get a very detailed sense of what's depicted in the cartoon. By not posting it on the web, we demonstrate a respect for deeply held religious beliefs.

I know it's not much fun, but I think it's the proper mode of conduct.

Given Mozilla's open and transparent approach, we are very detailed on how we publish our vulnerability reports, and we list each vulnerability separately. Other vendors don't. Other vendors often combine multiple vulnerabilities, for instance, into one security bulletin.

The reason that conservative talk radio works is because there is an audience for it.