I can only conclude the same geniuses who put the county budget together are now working as his campaign advisors.

If your party serves the powerful and well-funded interests, and there's no limit to what you can spend, you have a permanent, structural advantage. We're averaging fifty-dollar checks in our campaign, and trying to ward off these seven- or eight-figure checks on the other side. That disparity is pretty striking, and so are the implications. In many ways, we're back in the Gilded Age. We have robber barons buying the government.

We agree with Simpson and Bowles and others who have looked at this. What's necessary is to stabilize the debt and then work from there. You can't balance the budget in the short term because to do that would be to ratchet down the economy.

One can only conclude that they (magistrates) want to interfere with the election campaign.

Progressive and good organisations trust their hardworking employees more than their retained advisors.

We have been in contact with Michael and his advisors - and unfortunately he doesn't see Everton as a team he would choose at this present time.