I certainly supported a woman's right to choose, but to my mind the time to choose was before, not after the fact.

Abortion is a question of choice.

For years, Richard Riordan funded the anti-abortion movement, supported anti-choice candidates and even called abortion murder. Now he says he's pro-choice.

My argument has always been that nature has a master plan pushing every species toward procreation and that it is our right and even obligation as rational human beings to defy nature's fascism. Nature herself is a mass murderer, making casual, cruel experiments and condemning 10,000 to die so that one more fit will live and thrive.

Adoption was such a positive alternative to abortion, a way to save one life and brighten two more: those of the adoptive parents.

Are not Pro-Choice adherents really just Anti-Contraceptives, seeking pleasure over prudence? Are not Pro-Life adherents really just Anti-Contraceptives in order to control other people's sexual habits? So in reality, everybody is against contraceptives at the end of the day, for their own selfish reasons, at the cost of much life. I ask, where is the humanity in that?