I guess it means we will have to pursue our judicial branch option. We would have liked to continue talking about our options.

We're letting the lawyers do the talking.

The problem that all of us are trying to figure out is: When did out-of-state casinos become more important than in-state small businesses? We tried to persuade the Senate, and we tried to persuade the House. . . . We are now going to try to persuade the governor.

Small businesses, I can guarantee you, would be very upset if the Legislature chooses to ban a program that is legal, has been in effect for four years with full government oversight and full legislative explanation.

Not only do we think the state would be liable, we think it would be a horrible business practice for the state to decide they would like to go back on promises made in contracts with private individuals.

These same people who invested nearly $100 million are now being faced with bills at the Legislature that says these machines are to go away.