I think I'm a pretty nice fella.

I think Thomas Jefferson would have said the more speech, the better.

I do not think my impartiality could reasonably be questioned.

I would think the normal assumption is if one person wants that search excluded, that search is excluded.

As a general rule, I do not think it appropriate for judges to heap either praise or censure upon a legislative measure that comes before them, lest it be thought that their validation, invalidation, or interpretation of it is driven by their desire to expand or constrict what they personally approve or disapprove as a matter of policy.

If you think aficionados of a living Constitution want to bring you flexibility, think again. You think the death penalty is a good idea? Persuade your fellow citizens to adopt it. You want a right to abortion? Persuade your fellow citizens and enact it. That's flexibility.