Identification testimony is one of the more unreliable pieces of evidence for the prosecution.

Ninety percent of the evidence is going to be the testimony of these 42 inmate witnesses, and every single one will be getting something.

We think the ISM services number is one of the worst monthly pieces of data there are. On a month-to-month basis, it has no correlation with service sector employment, and on a quarter to quarter basis, it has no correlation with service sector gross domestic product.

Imagine if there is evidence critical to a criminal prosecution and the defendant challenges the evidence because it is constitutionally suspect. It could jeopardize any criminal case.

There have always been questions about reliability (of) other types of evidence -- eyewitness testimony or circumstantial evidence. Once they see the DNA evidence, there's no question. You are either guilty or not guilty.

There is not one single piece of evidence to bear out that libel as far as (Fhimah) is concerned in any respect whatsoever.