If even in science there is no a way of judging a theory but by assessing the number, faith and vocal energy of its supporters, then this must be even more so in the social sciences: truth lies in power.

If facts, logic, and scientific procedures are all just arbitrarily "socially constructed" notions, then all that is left is consensus--more specifically peer consensus, the kind of consensus that matters to adolescents or to many among the intelligentsia.

I've always been torn between the pure and the social sciences.

At different times I taught humanities, social sciences and pre-vocational education.

The SSN Institute will be expanded in areas such as liberal arts, social sciences, natural sciences, communications.

There is no falsification before the emergence of a better theory.