If he pleads guilty, then there's a feather in the cap of the prosecution quickly,

We feel with our name recognition, it?s another feather in their cap.

We are not trying to limit the President's ability to go after terrorists.

We do not say surveillance should be stopped, only that it comply with the law.

You would expect a translator to take his lead from the defense lawyer and you would not expect that translator to understand the intricacies of a very broad criminal statute. There is a real issue whether it's even fair to charge, much less convict, someone like him.

It was a very pro forma hearing, just the formal entry of his not guilty plea.