If that's the case, the earlier we can do it after diagnosis the better.

It is a suspected case, the diagnosis of bird flu is not confirmed for the moment.

If the INS had stuck with its earlier position that it was a case about custody ... then everyone would have felt that an open, fair process had been followed,

I think if he had proper diagnosis and treatment, he'd still be alive.

But why bother with diagnoses at all, if a diagnosis is but a restatement of the problem?

It is no wonder that I had tears of relief, to find out, finally, the truth - to discover an explanation, a diagnosis that explained not one or two of my symptoms or behaviours but ALL of them. Finally, someone saw me