If they hadn't given him blood thinners and he had another clot-related stroke — which could have happened — there would have been outrage and criticism that the doctors had not treated the first stroke aggressively enough.

If they hadn't given him blood thinners and he had another clot-related stroke - which could have happened - there would have been outrage and criticism that the doctors had not treated the first stroke aggressively enough.

If he's suffered a massive cerebral hemorrhage, it means a blood vessel in his brain has burst and the situation is really critical.

They may start seeing several observations that are of course better than nothing, but the big picture is still going to be that he's had a massive stroke. The damage is already there and I still would stick to the opinion that his prognosis is very, very poor even if he survives.

If they hadn't given him blood thinners and he had another clot-related stroke — which could have happened — there would have been outrage and criticism that the doctors had not treated the first stroke aggressively enough.

The doctors were responding to that first stroke properly with the use of blood thinners. It is unfair to critique them based on the information we have.