In any event, the proper question isn't what a journalist thinks is relevant but what his or her audience thinks is relevant. Denying people information they would find useful because you think they shouldn't find it useful is censorship, not journalism.

It was uncomfortable, I have to say, but I did think that it was relevant and useful, ... Also, it's erotic. There's no reason to pussyfoot around that. I thought it was vital, so I stripped.

It was uncomfortable, I have to say, but I did think that it was relevant and useful. Also, it's erotic. There's no reason to pussyfoot around that. I thought it was vital, so I stripped.

Some people think it's just easier to drag a journalist before a judge and try to get that information, rather than find it out on their own.

Genre labels are useful only insofar as they help you find an audience.

It wouldn't be fair to say that conservatives cherish property the way liberals cherish equality. But it would be fair to say that the takings clause is the conservatives' recipe for judicial activism just as they say liberals have misused the equal protection clause.