In the world of administrative decisions, this is about as defective as you can get. It was our grievance hearing, and they characterized it completely as a personnel matter ... yet they didn't do anything to reprimand that woman.

The thrust of this lawsuit is just a disagreement by the SHDC with the administrative decisions that have been made by the SHA basically in connection with its operation and management of federal funds under HUD rules. One of those decisions (was) that there had been so many rule violations and so much difficulty dealing with the SHDC the decision was made to terminate Housing Assistance Program contracts,

Maybe it was defective spokes.

The players association plans on filing a grievance on Chris Andersen's behalf. Our expectation is that a grievance hearing will take place in approximately two weeks.

The players' association plans on filing a grievance on Chris Andersen 's behalf. Our expectation is that a grievance hearing will take place in approximately two weeks.

Who's in the best position to make decisions for these patients? To erect more administrative hurdles really doesn't make sense.