Isn't it funny. One victim gets to dictate the result, the other gets the door slammed in her face.

The prosecutor is probably still trying to pressure some of the players to turn, getting more info from the victim and looking at more forensic evidence.

I don't think this is one of those sort of rage killings that happened on the spur of the moment. (And) there's a lot of evidence of premeditation in case, getting the weapon, the cover-up, the fact that he was returning the gun to the place he took it, from Rachel's stepfather.

We have door buzzers and locks and stuff where we lock the door. Of course, he gets one where they don't have a lock on it yet. But, we're putting a lock on it now.

One cannot dictate an aphorism to a typist. It would take too long.

The description of the bodies really didn't match what the police found at the scene. I think this is a guy who is desperately trying to cover up what he had done, but really couldn't even get his story straight.