It is incredibly hard to win a suppression motion in this state, because the evidence of consent is largely circumstantial.

Circumstantial evidence shows that someone took the knife from the scene.

Some circumstantial evidence is very strong as when you find a trout in the milk

We have the rules because police have historically violated civil rights. We wouldn't need the constitution to protect our freedoms if we had a government we always agreed with and we would let the legislature make whatever laws they wanted and we would follow them.

There have always been questions about reliability (of) other types of evidence -- eyewitness testimony or circumstantial evidence. Once they see the DNA evidence, there's no question. You are either guilty or not guilty.

From what I have seen, there seems to be some circumstantial evidence which might lead one to think that some of the defendants at least may be guilty, I haven't seen anything which would enable a conviction to be brought.