It would be our position that it is totally inadmissible. My client adamantly denies being involved in that. There is no evidence.

My client has been in jail for 19 months. They so totally have the wrong guy.

They're outstanding individuals, outstanding citizens of the community, and I think the facts will bear that out. The media and people look at something one way. You have to look at the entire circumstance. When these cases get in the media's eye, it's always one-sided.

The circumstances of his admission will support the defense we intend to proffer at trial.

I take the position that, because of the ex post facto clause, in essence, my client is being held for a crime that is no longer a crime because the statute of limitations has expired.

If you are not emotionally involved, your client is not getting your best effort.