It's always been our view that there was poor record-keeping and/or someone was stealing wine from Mark.

He would have no motive whatsoever to set a fire. Mark may be the obvious culprit, as in 'the butler did it.' But I've played enough Clue to know that the butler never does it.

I've tried to set up a meeting with them and haven't heard back. So, technically, the ball's in their court.

My understanding is they're focusing on everyone who was in the building that day. And if someone had a motive to start a fire and wanted to make it appear that Mark Anderson had started it, around his area is exactly where they'd do it. Mark Anderson had no motive to start the fire and is not responsible for it.

Marriage is like wine. It is not be properly judged until the second glass.

What would women do if they could not cry? What poor, defenseless creatures they would be