It's not that PowerPoint brought the Columbia down, but the method of presentation broke up the argument into tiny fragments, and it's intensely hierarchical-no sentences, just little phrases.

What this means is that we shouldn't abbreviate the truth but rather get a new method of presentation.

We shouldn’t abbreviate the truth but rather get a new method of presentation.

The point is that analytical designs are not to be decided on their convenience to the user or necessarily their readability or what psychologists or decorators think about them; rather, design architectures should be decided on how the architecture assists analytical thinking about evidence.

You punch me, I punch back. I do not believe it's good for ones self-respect to be a punching bag.

Our work is the presentation of our capabilities.