Just because we are talking about the Internet does not mean we should lose the right to speak anonymously.

It's a functional test: Is what you are doing journalism?

We are going to continue to pursue this until we get some rules from the court that will protect users' anonymity online.

It's going to be an important case, because it will go forward in raising a lot of questions ranging from rules that all journalists should follow when protecting their (sources) to the very definition of what a journalist is in the digital age.

This case comes at a time when people are starting to recognize that the information they put into their computers creates a record. In the bigger picture, as people input more information into computers, they are losing control over that. We're leaving a digital footprint with all sorts of information about ourselves.

Independent florists can't make it with the brick-and-mortar model anymore. We decided upfront we would be an Internet-only company.