FastSaying

Making it non-mandatory for usage may free up the state from any funding; but we have spoken with our insurance company and they have said not enforcing the use of the seatbelts would open us up to many liability issues. I'm not completely against (the bill). My main concern is whether or not the school will receive the $10,000-$15,000 needed to make the change?

Related Quotes

To make the usage of particle filters for Diesel cars mandatory could drop the numbers significantly.
— Gergely Simon
CarsDropFilters
I'm OK, It would be the first free lawyer I've ever spoken with.
— John Gotti
FirstFreeLawyer
They do it from the heart. They don't get any funding for it from the state or federal government.
— Chris Green
FederalFundingGovernment
Having a venture of this magnitude fills two obligations: One to the state to get as much usage of the stadium as possible, which is a hard task; the other is to our suite holders, who we try to get a couple of extra events for the buy they make.
— Dennis Mannion
FillsMagnitudeObligations
It has to be mandatory.
— Rich Roberts
Mandatory