Negligence is much easier to prove; it's the failure to exercise reasonable care. Willful misconduct is a much higher standard. You must intentionally misbehave. ... The high standard would clearly discourage many suits.

The question is how high the liability shield needs to be. I think 'willful misconduct' is too high. We usually use some kind of negligence standard in these situations. It would be very unusual that you could prove that intentional misconduct had happened.

There is no standard parameter for victory because the yardstick differs all the time!!

It's going to be difficult in most circumstances to reach that standard of gross negligence when you have the context of an unknown enemy, an enemy that does use civilian clothes and is often using civilian vehicles and persons to attack.

loving someone is weakness .as well as strength for self . which one you want to use ?

In a lot of ways, the standard of living for servants was a lot higher than they would have had somewhere else.