Nothing can be divided into more parts than it can possibly be constituted of. But matter (i.e. finite) cannot be constituted of infinite parts.

That the divided but contiguous particles of bodies may be separated from one another is a matter of observation; and, in the particles that remain undivided, our minds are able to distinguish yet lesser parts, as is mathematically demonstrated.

The infinite is contained within the finite, just as the name implies: In finite.

It is indeed a matter of great difficulty to discover, and effectually to distinguish, the true motions of particular bodies from the apparent because the parts of that immovable space, in which those motions are performed, do by no means come under the observation of our senses.

We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances.

Attempting to contain the infinite within finite symbolism of language may result in scholarship, but it will not produce devotion. (110)