Our indicators are not even close to suggesting such lofty returns.

These indicators are suggesting a pickup in economic activity over the next few months now that the monetary constraint on growth has been lifted. Hooray.

Consumer sentiment about job prospects over the next six months dipped in January. Thus, not only are the indicators suggesting modest gains in hiring, but consumers also do not think more new jobs will start opening up this spring.

I'm still unclear on how indicators and standards are not only going to be used, but how they are (being) made. In spite of all the input there is not enough data to support any of the numerical standards proposed in the document - any data is inconsistent.

It just makes me sick to my stomach that we were close to doing something that would have been very significant and again, we come up just short on it. We had our chances.

Even at a $200 million IPO valuation, if you can get it, you're not getting anything like venture-like returns.