So interviews are a valuable tool, but under certain circumstances they'd be more valuable than others.

The U.N. is much more than the case of Iraq.

Like I said, I'm more worried long term about the environmental issues then the use of arms.

You never get quite down to the bottom of the barrel, but we are much higher than that at the present time. There is quite a lot left in the barrel that could be explained by them. If they have some weapons, if they have some anthrax, they should deliver that.

I think it's clear that in March, when the invasion took place, the evidence that had been brought forward was rapidly falling apart,

When we find material for chemical ammunition, we have to ask ourselves,