Such as a universe that is not made of dead, mute, inert matter.

It's good to see that you have a rudimentary grasp of the design inference. I was not making a design inference when I employed the building analogy.

Science, properly understood, should merely be defined as the knowledge man can gain from observing the natural world.

The fact that cells reproduce and buildings don't has absolutely nothing to do with the point that was being made.

I have been known to do that, it just wasn't happening there.

1. Poor design is still design.