Surprisingly, in over two centuries of Supreme Court precedent, the issue has never been squarely presented and resolved -- until now.

This is an issue that is ultimately going to have to be resolved by the Supreme Court. Because you're ultimately not likely ever going to have doctors in the execution chamber.

I have received a reply from the Supreme People's Court which said the issue might be resolved this year.

We think it would be beneficial for the issue to be heard by the Supreme Court.

He agreed that it is the unusual case in which a prevailing Supreme Court precedent would be overturned. He basically said _ I want to be careful about this, not putting words in his mouth _ that Roe was precedent on which people, a lot of people relied, that it had been precedent for decades and therefore deserves great respect.

He agreed that it is the unusual case in which a prevailing Supreme Court precedent would be overturned. He basically said ? I want to be careful about this, not putting words in his mouth ? that Roe was precedent on which people, a lot of people relied, that it had been precedent for decades and therefore deserves great respect.