That's astonishing, astonishing that they would get a grand jury to indict and allege there is a list and then they have to admit in open court the first time they appear in open court that there is no list.

Ronnie Earle didn't indict him. The grand jury indicted him.

If the district attorney wanted, a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich.

I am speculating that it is clear in leaked grand jury testimony that he acknowledged he did it.

How can we decide on the fairness of the process without determining what is in the interviews, grand jury testimony and boxes of documents that, for totally unexplained reasons, the Independent Counsel withheld?

They wouldn't go in front of the grand jury unless they had something to go after.