The discrimination was aimed at John McDonald. Domino's itself viewed JWM as John McDonald.

Absolutely. That's perfectly within the realm of what should be done.

Certainly there is nothing that prohibits the commission or the (Gaming) Control Board from saying to properties, you have to be careful about and responsible for the security of any type of venue. But it can't go to content.

It really doesn't matter whether there has been an attempt at an outright ban or merely an attempt to influence these properties. We're still talking about action that is taken under the color of the law and is therefore governmental action that is, frankly, censorship.

This is a substantial amount of money. This is not some symbolic type of gesture, this is the procedure to be followed.

Imagine for a moment you owed money to the city of Las Vegas. You owed the money in October, but you ignored it for all these months. You think they'd take action against you? Of course they would.