The evidence is consistent at every step of the way that Mr. Russell is responsible.

It's highly, highly critical of his reliability. They should have the truth before them, his prior conviction for dishonesty. There is no crime that's more probative than lying to a jury.

We're trying to figure out the truth of what happened.

It blew his alibi out of the water.

They can take it quite a ways further.

The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd; indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widely spread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.