The fact that Robert Blake wants a do-over doesn't mean that he's entitled to one. The fact that Mr. Blake is not happy about his legacy is something Mr. Blake should have thought of before he killed his wife.

If Robert Blake got in his car after his wife was killed he would have blood on him. (Blake) had no blood on him at all.

We had a three-month trial. The jury took two weeks in deciding that Robert Blake killed his wife. The fact that Robert Blake wants a do-over does not mean he's entitled to one. He's no different than anybody else. He had his day in court, and he lost.

I don't know if there is any ambiguity to it. I don't take what he said lightly.

It's a new jury, so I guess we have a new alibi. I would call it a desperate and insulting attempt to create an alibi that had never been there for four years.

How many times would you say you lied under oath since your wife was murdered on May 4, 2001 ?