The house has to serve comfort. The work of art is revolutionary; the house is conservative.

The work of art is brought into the world without there being a need for it. The house satisfies a requirement. The work of art is responsible to none; the house is responsible to everyone. The work of art wants to draw people out of their state of comfort.

The work of art shows people new directions and thinks of the future. The house thinks of the present.

The house has to please everyone, contrary to the work of art which does not. The work is a private matter for the artist. The house is not.

The room has to be comfortable; the house has to look habitable.

It is ridiculous to lay down to people where a thing should stand, design everything for them from the lavatory pan to the ashtray. On the contrary, I like people to move their furniture so that it suits them (not me!), and it's quite natural (and I approve) when they bring the old pictures and mementos they have come to love into a new interior, irrespective of whether they are good taste or bad.