The rabbi did not claim any responsibility for the violence. The demonstrators never apologized for it, and never regretted it.

Not all Muslims become involved in acts of violence. Yet all might be held culpable. THis is because that section of Muslim--in fact, the majority--who are not personally involved, neither disown those members of their community who are engaged in violence, nor even condemn them. In such a case, according to the Islamic Shariah itself, if the involved Muslims are directly responsible, the uninvolved Muslims are also indirectly responsible. (p. 91)

It is our responsibility to teach them alternatives to violence, how to manage their anger, how to deal with conflict peacefully, the golden rule of treating others the way you want to be treated and to think before they act.

Intoxication can cause a person to do things they might otherwise not do.

I certainly think the door's open. It's up to the city to argue otherwise and a judge to decide it.

I think that's absolutely fair game. Why is he intoxicated if he's on duty?