The tapestry of history has no point at which you can cut it and leave the design intelligible.

If these [motions] are going to be seriously pursued there is a lot to be resolved.

It's possible something Ellis said out of court might be used not only against him but Mr. DeLay. There is one exception to the hearsay rule: for statements made by co-conspirators.

My judgment is that simply because a prosecutor decides that one approach is more effective than another doesn't necessarily suggest some major weakness or anything other than a continuing effort to adjust the case to what appears to be the most favorable theory,

This is serious stuff. They have obviously upped the ante.

For every social wrong there must be a remedy. But the remedy can be nothing less than the abolition of the wrong.