The vote by the Judiciary Committee reflects the fact that John Roberts is an exceptional nominee with a conservative judicial philosophy - a philosophy that represents mainstream America.

With her conservative judicial philosophy, she understands that judges must not legislate from the bench. And while she may hold personal views that underscore the value of human life, it would be wrong for those views to be used against her in the confirmation process.

There could not be a better person for such an important position than John Roberts,

They're all focusing on how John Roberts is going to decide Roe v. Wade. That isn't even the right question. I don't even know of a case in the (court) system that addresses it.

Pat Robertson's an influential conservative leader. He's quite capable of picking up the phone himself.

Pat Robertson's an influential conservative leader, ... He's quite capable of picking up the phone himself.