There is nothing in this document that would require a change in the current practice,

Unless you get a critical mass of bishops and religious superiors who say, Now we can't admit any gay men, I don't think it's going to have any discernible effect, ... There are lots of excellent gay priests and seminarians, and we have a priest shortage. We're not exactly in a buyer's market here. If you're not going to ordain gay men, and not going to ordain married men, and not going to ordain women, well then who's left? It's not exactly a big pool.

I think the instruction is Rome's answer to all the different pressures brought to bear on it, ... It's presented in a somewhat ambiguous fashion with in-house vocabulary that allows for a range of interpretation to be taken from it. A lot will depend on where the bishop falls on the issue beforehand.

He's saying, 'Let's not go into the closet, let's not do

It's great to say we can make a change in practice. It's always best to provide patient care based on evidence rather than guessing at it.

I don't think we'll have to change anything (from the first game). Just by having more practice and with greater intensity has helped us improve our game.