There's no precedent for this.

There is no precedent for this, but there is no question who put this situation in motion. If they did not have their illegal strike, there is no question that this would not have happened.

It's remarkable in the sense there is no precedent and now it creates a precedent on that, which creates much dialogue in constitutional circles..

It's still an event that you need to be aware of. There's still a lot of activity in these names. Activity in terms of money is down, but not as much as some people might think.

People anticipate supply and demand and go out ahead of time and try to profit from this.

I think if the ruling had gone the other way, then it would have been a precedent, which would have created many difficulties for schools that wanted to have a school uniform. As it is, I think, what's happened is that it's really preserved the status quo -- that if a pupil is not wearing the proper school uniform, then it is perfectly right for the school to take disciplinary action.