They'll put him away for 20 years. But is that justification for killing someone?

They put him away for 20 years. Is that justification for killing someone? In my eyes, no. I guess the hardest was to look at my nephew, Greg, Jr., and to see him grow up without his dad.

He has destroyed our family by this senseless killing, and has left a void in everyone's life.

When we say that humans have a “right” not to be used for these purposes, this means simply that the interest of humans in not being used as non-consenting subjects in experiments will be protected even if the consequences of using them would be very beneficial for the rest of us. The question, then, is why do we think that it is morally acceptable to use nonhumans in experiments but not to use humans?

Vivisection, Part Two: The Moral Justification of Vivisection | Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach

A lot of times, the offer to purchase and contribute to a cause is a justification or rationalization to purchase with a particular retailer.

We strongly condemn this attack and can see no conceivable justification for this atrocity.