They're going to change the language in their commercials to eliminate what we thought was an inaccurate statement.

The issue is whether it's cost-effective for the tax system and good for taxpayers.

We would like to have a permanent injunction to avoid future litigation should any similar claim come up any time after April 30.

They are probably only going to change the language enough to give them the option to pause.

The language was ill-advised. In the opinion of the deputy chiefs, (the change) was not good policy and they directed that revisions be made.

From our standpoint, the change in language represents a small step toward an eventual rate hike.