This was a fatally flawed environmental impact analysis.

This is fatally flawed. It's not even close.

What the NOAA letter does is confirm that the Navy analysis is fundamentally flawed.

The next step (in pursuing a rail link) would be to do an alternatives analysis and a draft environmental impact statement. But we don't have a time frame for going forward, and we don't have the project in our capital budget.

Our analysis of data produced by Deep Impact is revealing a great deal, much of it rather surprising.

In our study we did a meta-analysis of all the trials, and were not able to show any reduction in cancer or in cancer deaths.