To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.

Respondent's expectation that his garden was protected from observation is unreasonable and is not an expectation that society is prepared to honor.

There can be no assumption that today's majority is 'right' and the Amish and others like them are 'wrong.' A way of life that is odd or even erratic but interferes with no rights or interests of others is not to be condemned because it is different.

We are more casual about qualifying the people we allow to act as advocates in the courtroom than we are about licensing electricians.

Calculated risks of abuse are taken in order to preserve higher values.

Calculated risks of abuse are taken in order to preserve higher values.