Tyco is really correct here. They did make the required disclosure in their cash flow statement as far as how much money they spend net of the cash they received of those companies, so I can see Tyco's point.

How the game (2nd ODI) was going it was required for someone to stop the flow of wickets that the opposition was getting so I had to decide what role was best for the team so that was the role I took up to stop the flow of wickets.

Factually, his statement is correct, ... If someone is offended by that, I think that is their problem. I think he ought to stand fast. At the most say, 'I could've chose my words more carefully, but I do stand by what I say.'

They didn't want full disclosure,

The three most dreaded words in the English language are 'negative cash flow'.

The issues have been about full and fair disclosure, transparency, and basic fair dealing, which are all required by our laws.