under a mutual use of property, a party has lost an expectation of an exclusive right of privacy.

You can imagine we have an expectation of privacy more so than opening this up to 20 units.

Right now I think the expectation is that a lot of these companies are meeting muted estimates. I think you'll see earnings guided higher, but that outlooks will be tempered.

While Roberts wanted to give the impression he respected the right to privacy and the precedent of Roe vs. Wade, his answers look dangerously similar to the responses (Associate Justice) Clarence Thomas gave senators during his confirmation hearings 14 years ago.

[It was the same story when Roberts was asked whether he believed in a person's right to privacy, a cornerstone of Roe v. Wade.] Senator, I do. The right to privacy is protected under the Constitution in various ways, ... matters of conscience.

It sounds like something Rehnquist would have written. William Rehnquist didn't believe there is a right to privacy either.