Under First Amendment jurisprudence, content-based laws are presumptively unconstitutional and can be justified only if the governmental regulation advances a compelling interest in the least restrictive means available.

The court ruled that the law was content-based because it restricted only sexually explicit adult programming,

Individual plaintiffs would have to go into court and show the regulation was unconstitutional as applied to them, and over time different plaintiffs would chip away at the unconstitutional features of a new abortion regulation. It would be time consuming and expensive, ... What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said.

but based on solid technological advances.

I believe if something is unconstitutional 25 years from now it's unconstitutional now. I was treated differently based on my skin color. And that was wrong.

Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them