virtually every discipline and endeavor is presently under a naturalistic pall.

What needs to happen if you're going to tell an evolutionary story is you have to tell a story of gradual change and at each point there has to be some sort of selective advantage. The evidence is just not there that these processes can do the sort of design work that I am pointing to.

[The intelligent-design textbook at the heart of the Dover case,] Of Pandas and People, ... The Design of Life: Discovering Signs of Intelligence in Biological Systems.

To lift that pall will require a new generation of scholars and professionals who explicitly reject naturalism and consciously seek to understand the design that God has placed in the world,

advances in probability theory, computer science, the concept of information, molecular biology and the philosophy of science.

If your worldview starts with a problematic origin story, everything else is going to be infected.