We don't know what his intent is one way or the other. Certainly any business has a necessity of planning for its own future. That's his business, so we have really no reaction to that one way or the other.

I think it's a phenomenal net plus for business travelers. We're going to have a smaller industry that by necessity means there won't be the frequency of flights and convenience for some people. But up through 2000, 90 percent of my time was spent on three issues -- skyrocketing business fares, gridlock at airports and worsening service levels. I think those three issues will be resolved over the next few years.

All that stuff about what had been agreed on and a letter of intent -- none of that is true. What is accurate is Kevin's quote that there is no deal.

We have contracted to abate the asbestos in the building. There are no definitive plans at this point. Any future use of the premises requires abatement.

It's less of a problem than it has been.

Our cash position remains very strong at over $4 billion, and we are planning a return to sustained profitability beginning this quarter,