We never sued Microsoft for having a monopoly, ... We sued them for what they did with their monopoly. And that I think is going to be the cutting-edge issue in antitrust issues.

We [Microsoft] don't have a monopoly. We have market share. There's a difference.

The response by Microsoft is essentially a meaningless response,

Having had a monopoly over the desktop, Microsoft [Corp.] has had the advantage of forcing their standards on users,

Microsoft is unlawfully taking advantage of its Windows monopoly to protect and extend that monopoly,

Microsoft is a monopoly -- that's pure and simple in my view. There's no question that Microsoft is able to breach a contract because they have monopoly power. I believe that would be a very positive step forward in the Microsoft case,